Photoionisation of neutral species

Ionisation by cosmic rays

To model the ionisation of the neutral species by cosmic rays, we use the approximation shown in [lehtinen2007]

\[q = q_p \frac{N}{N_p} \exp (1 - N/N_p)\]

with \(N\) the neutral density. \(N_p\) is the neutral density at the peak of the production, at altitude \(h_p\). \(q_p\) is the maximum value of \(q\). We take:

  • \(Q_p = 10 cm^{-3} s^{-1}\)

  • \(h_p = 15 km\)

Ionisation by solar flux

Once the absorbed fluxes are computed (see Absorption of the solar flux), the next step is to compute the number of ions/electron pairs produced. This is done through

\[Q = N \times \sigma_N^i \times \Phi \times k_\lambda\]

where \(N\) is the number density of the neutral species being ionised, \(\sigma_i\) is the ionisation cross-section and \(\Phi\) is the absorbed flux. \(k_\lambda\) is the ionisation efficiency, given by [nicolet1960] and [bourdeau1966] . It is 45 for soft X-ray flux and 165 for hard X-rays, and represents the number of electron-ion pairs per photon in the solar flux.

We consider here that:

  • \(O_2\) is ionised by soft and hard X-rays to give \(O_2^+\)

  • \(O_2(^1 \Delta_g)\) is ionised by EUV and UV flux to give \(O_2^+\) ([pavlov2014], [paulsen1972])

  • \(N_2\) is ionised by soft and hard X-rays to give \(N_2^+\), which is immediately converted into \(0_2^+\)

  • \(NO\) is ionised by EUV fluxes to give \(NO^+\)

Important

The value of \(Q\) also has to be converted into particles/cm-3, which means converting \(\Phi\) by multiplying it by a factor \(\frac{\lambda}{2 \pi \hbar c}\). \(\lambda\) is the average wavelength here

All the cross sections are given in [pavlov2014] (Table 3) and its Erratum. The ionisation, absorption cross-sections and \(k_\lambda\) (see Photoionisation of neutral species) for hard X-rays are found in [siskind2022] . The only exception is the \(k_\lambda\) factor (\(pe/pi + 1\), with the notations in [siskind2022]) for the ionisation of \(O\) is 217.2 for the lowest HXR bin (it was not precised in the article, so we took the averaged value for [solomon2005] ).

Ionisation of \(O^+\) and \(N^+\)

In addition to the species mentioned above, the solar X-ray flux also ionises \(N_2\) and \(O_2\) to give \(O^+\) and \(N^+\). Those two species are not present in our ions scheme, but they contribute to the ionisation as they are converted into \(NO^+\) and \(O2^+\).

From the reactions rate reported in Table 6 of [pavlov2014] , the ratio of \(NO^+\) to \(O_2^+\) created can be determined. This is done in the conversion_OpNp() function. Those added contributions to the ion densities are recomputed from the solar X-ray flux at each time-step, similarly to any other ionisation source, for both \(N^+\) and \(O^+\).

Ionisation of \(O_2(^1 \Delta_g)\)

As mentioned above, this is done following [paulsen1972] . We use the formulation proposed by [swider1979] which explicitely involves H and Ch. Those two quantities are therefore computed once by the chapman() function and stored as an attribute of the radiation class.

\[ \begin{align}\begin{aligned}q(O_2^+) = [O_2 (^1 \Delta_g)] (0.549 \times 10^{-9} \exp(-2.406\times 10^{-20} [O_2] H Ch)\\+ 2.614 \times 10^{-9} \exp(-8.508\times 10^{-20} [0_2] H Ch))\end{aligned}\end{align} \]

In practice, this is done by calling the different functions of compute_ionisation (cibelow):

# Compute photon fluxes, using the taus already computed
Phi_SXR, Phi_HXR, Phi_EUV = ci.compute_photon_flux(rad_here)

# Compute ionisation of different species

# O+ from O2
ionisation_Op = ci.ion_O2_to_Op(Phi_SXR, Phi_HXR, rad_here, n_here)

# N2+ from N2
ionisation_N2p = ci.ion_N2_to_N2p(Phi_SXR, Phi_HXR, rad_here, n_here)

# N+ from N2
ionisation_Np = ci.ion_N2_to_Np(Phi_SXR, Phi_HXR, rad_here, n_here)

# NO+ from NO
ionisation_NOp = ci.ion_NO_to_NOp(Phi_EUV, rad_here, n_here)

# Cosmic-rays
ionisation_cr = ionisation_cr = ci.ion_from_cosmicrays(n_here, rad_here)

For a quiet day in winter above Italy (solar zenith angle : 58°), this gives:

../../_images/Ionisation_layer.png

Important

We consider that all \(N_2^+\) are converted into \(O_2^+\) (e.g. [mitra1975] ).